A Note On Trackback Attacks

This site has been undergoing some trackback attacks today. IP numbers seem random, but post selection does not (?). Some issues connecting with TypePad server for admin, etc. Perhaps others are encountering the same issue. Depending how extensive this turns out, I may need to shut down the blog for awhile.

Management Consulting: The Spring Cleaning Method And Getting Over Humps

I had a lunch meeting the other day, and my contact and I talked briefly about one method that a number of management consulting firms use. I used this method now, and I used it at PRTM and prior companies. I suspect the method may be more typical in execution-oriented management consulting firms as compared to pure strategy firms. The technique never had a formal name, but I call it "The Spring Cleaning Method". It goes with the time of year, and it captures the spirit of the idea. Note that method should not be confused with the Al Dunlap ("Chainsaw Al") version of "cleaning house" though!

The Spring Cleaning Method of Management Consulting consists of an executive- or management-level meeting (e.g., 1.5 days) to talk about the business in great breadth, capture issues (no-holds barred), rank issues, strategize, and divide and attack.

The basic value of a Spring Cleaning management team meeting is as follows:

  • The meeting forces people to think proactively. While management may have regular weekly management meetings, it becomes easy to become caught up in the day-to-day grind and push off things that people don’t have time for but know are important.
  • The manager (e.g., CEO, COO, President, GM) that oversees the functional line roles has an opportunity to reset expectations and goals. This can be psychological or real. Whatever works to get people moving and thinking actively.
  • Involvement of a management consultant provides both an independent (non-political) fresh look and extra, versatile, project bandwidth. The management consultant may be expected to work with all of the above parties above to prepare information in advance, facilitate the meeting discussion using standard- or firm-specific business frameworks (or choke, create one on the fly), gather notes, organize and triage, and develop a proposed project plan and/or a traceable set of issues and action items. The management consultant is generally brought in to be a right-hand man to the sponsoring manager/executive.

In the Spring Cleaning meetings that I have worked on, a typical meeting may last 1.5 days. Roughly speaking, the first meeting is brainstorming and getting the info out. Through the night the consultant works to organize the notes, data, perform analyses, etc. The next half-day is spent working through the high points, prioritizing, and drilling down next steps.

While different clients vary, post-meeting the management consultant may be retained both as a generalist for project managing things forward and as specialist for working with a specific functional group (e.g., that has more items to work on, less bandwidth, more time critical items, more need for competitive or quantitative analysis). In change management, the goal of the organization is to get over humps or change course while running the business – not to employ a management consultant for the long-haul or create a dependency of the organization on the consultant.

As a final note, the project management aspect should not be underestimated (a form of overconfidence bias). As with many change management efforts, there is tremendous value to monitoring, measuring, and cracking the whip. Professional sports players (e.g., golf, tennis) don’t cut corners on coaches when making critical changes in technique. Why should a company be any different? If there is enough value to resolving issues, make sure that someone signs up a diplomatic and detailed-oriented person to make sure things drive forward.

Steve Shu

Don’t forget to subscribe to Steve Shu’s blog now (click icon)! Business and technology information for everyone.

Sapient CTO Says Blogs Are Digital Equivalent Of Pet Rock

Sapient, a business consulting and technology services company, speaks out on blogging. As posted by Jupiter Research:

It was bound to happen. Blogger backlash has set in. Witness
Sapient, a leading business consulting and technology services company,
issuing a “media alert” with the headline, “Blog tech doesn’t live up
to blog talk, according to Sapient CTO.” Ben Gaucherin, the CTO in
question, says blogs “are a fad fueled by pop culture’s desperate
search for the next big thing.” When I spoke with Gaucherin he was even
more emphatic than he was in his news alert. He told me that blogs are
the digital equivalent of the pet rock.
[InfoWorld: Columnists]

Although I have never thought of Sapient as being a traditional consulting firm (kind of a hybrid like Scient, iXL, Viant, Diamond Technology Partners, etc.), Sapient is one of the few branded consulting firms I have heard speak out on and against blogging. Will be interesting to see if other consulting firms speak out.

Hat tip: Scoble

For The Blog Museum: Email Signature Block Footer Of The Past Versus Present

Past footer for corporate emails:

The information contained in this transmission may contain privileged and confidential information.  It is intended only for the use of the person(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient,  you are hereby notified that any review, dissemination, distribution or duplication of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message. To reply to our email administrator directly, please send an email to postmaster@s4management.com

Present footer for corporate emails:

This email is [] bloggable [X] ask first [] private

Original source for present footer: I don’t know. Two steps removed is Ross Mayfield.

The Blogosphere Concludes The MBA Is Worthless

These results irk me to no end (because I have a lot of professorial friends in the b-schools that look to improve their programs all the time), but the blogosphere consensus as seeded by Seth Godin appears to be that the MBA is not an education. He is not alone in his claim. He is supported by a number of other prominent MBAs referenced in blogosphere conversations (click here, but note that the Blogpulse computation may take a while).

Note there are some potential measurement errors here in terms of what is tracked (looks like only formal trackbacks are included) because other conversations have clearly been spawned from Seth’s thread.

That said, presuming the Blogpulse measurement is representative of the crowd consensus, is the wisdom of crowds correct here? I’ve casually thrown in the "crowds" argument to support some of my prior posts, so I can’t have it both ways if the crowds argument is a valid argument, and the crowd concludes the MBA is bunk. Have any pre-conditions for the wisdom of crowds been violated in the Blogpulse chart?

A Few Link Pointers On Venture and High-Tech Compensation

Some of these are older references, but these contain information on stock options (Be forewarned that one needs to be very careful that one is comparing apples to apples when looking at this data or getting compensation benchmark information.):

  • Brad Feld – on board compensation for directors (no cash for you early-stage directors)
  • Ed Sim – on HBS compensation study
  • Salary.com reference – here (one of the most detailed breakdowns I have seen on the net albeit potentially biased to include companies that have filed S-1s)

Other sources I have used for getting this information from: law firms, serial entrepreneurs, VCs, CFOs, other execs, and sometimes executive recruiters. Stock option compensation can be a bit of black art in my mind (as I mentioned in comment section of Brad’s post).