I had a post here, which seemed to indicate based on the comments that people value ethics .
But Mike McLaughlin, who I interviewed here on the management consulting industry, points out some (sad and funny) stats that indicate wez hypocritical.

Professor of Practice of Behavioral Economics
I had a post here, which seemed to indicate based on the comments that people value ethics .
But Mike McLaughlin, who I interviewed here on the management consulting industry, points out some (sad and funny) stats that indicate wez hypocritical.
In no particular order:
More on the predictability of toilet paper, from the Seinfeld episode where George Castanza is relating the discussion he had on a date:
George: We discussed toilet paper.
Jerry: Toilet paper?
George: Yeah, I told her how toilet paper hasn’t changed in my lifetime, and probably wouldn’t change in the next fifty thousand years and she was fascinated, fascinated!
Jerry: What are you talking about?
Elaine: Yeah.
Jerry: Toilet paper’s changed.
Elaine: Yeah.
Jerry: It’s softer.
Elaine: Softer.
Jerry: More sheets per roll
Elaine: Sheets.
Jerry: Comes in a wide variety of colors.
Elaine: Colors.
George: Ok, ok, fine! It’s changed, it’s not really the point. Anyway, I’m thinking of making a big move.
Having followed tech.memeorandum casually for a couple of months, I’m getting a little more used to its user interface. The politics thread is here, and the technology one is here (the latter being the only one I’ve traveled).
The one problem that I have had with the user interface for memeorandum is that I don’t generally consider myself to be a news junkie or maven that combs through copius amounts of internet information.
But I am finding that the tool can be useful to help me find information clusters on current topics. It is helping me to locate other information sources more passively and to determine whether my current list of information sources may be lacking in any way. New sites might benefit by having this type of interface.
What has been difficult for me to assess, however, is how high quality is the main thread of information that travels through tech.memeorandum? Just because there is a lot of dialogue around topics picked up by tech.memeorandum does not mean I will have much interest in any of the main threads. Would be interesting if the main thread could be more customizable or trainable. Alternatively, if the main thread had coverage reputation like a mainstream media publication, then I would commit more eyeball time to the site.
J. Rextor has an interesting annecdotal comment at his b-school blog at BusinessWeek, where he is using his blog to recount the experience of searching for a new executive position within a firm. The comment is:
… I did receive an email back from one of [executive recruiters] that stated it takes
approximately 3.2 years for most executives to find an upwardly mobile
executive position in another company.
I have not really had much appreciation for the personal value and legitimacy of executive severance clauses until the past few years where I have seen a number of friends have to find new jobs at senior levels. If one is faced with the situation of having to leave a situation of a good fit with a prior firm, it can be hard to get the balance right again when looking for a new job. At higher-levels, awesome positions can be scarce to come by, and severance compensation can be viewed as consideration for longer job search times for like-level positions. That said, and while I’m no compensation expert, 3.2 years does seem pretty high to me. I’d have to sample some other executive recruiters for feedback, but I’m pretty certain that their cycle time must be shorter than this for placement of executives (guessing 12 months?).
See the post over at Susan Mernit’s blog. No direct connections to blogging as far as I can tell (upon cursory analysis), but there is a strong connection to internet and online businesses in the referenced articles.
Posts by Umair Haque, Fred Wilson, and Jeff Nolan are all talking about the looming attention crisis (see here & here) related to information overload and the blogosphere. Wilson captures Umair’s words:
Herbert Simon said it in 1971, which is that "What does an abundance of information create?" A scarcity of attention basically, right?
It’s funny that blogging is starting to replace email conversations (based on ROI), yet we are still in overload. I, for one, peaked out at reading between 50 and 100 feeds, and I needed to start to drop some and add others as my work balance shifted.
For those may not know, blogging was heavily influenced the seminal blogging work, "The Cluetrain Manifesto". The takeaway saying from that work has been "markets are conversations".
But I think with the doubling of the blogosphere hand over fist (with no end in sight on the graphical charts) we are starting to see some limits as to what people can process.
That is why I think we will see a return to works that preceded the Cluetrain by 50-60 some years in the 1940s. These are the seminal works of Claude Shannon on information theory, and much of his work was written in plain English without having to be decorated with tons of mathematics. We may find inspiration in solving some of our new problems from the information theory and related fields.
Some key items from the field of information theory:
The blogosphere faces similar challenges in terms of capacity limitations, means for improving efficiency, and information distortion.
Feedreaders can speed the process of reading blogs. I’m guessing my efficiency in reading news went up 50%+ after shifting to a feedreader.
At some point though, I ran out of channel bandwidth using this method. What to do then?
Well as folks like Andrew have pointed out (as does Jeff Nolan in his post), people do a lot of linking to the same posts. Good case for unsubscribing to A-list blogs because you get the same information everywhere. But I suppose that the unsubscribing method for reducing information may create some distortion. One is not getting info straight from the horse’s mouth so to speak.
Other methods, such as using web services to aggregate tags (as recently contracted by Nivi) are also a way to reduce information. But I suppose that this method could create distortion in that one is seeking information that tends to be the same as what you’ve always sought out in the past.
Another area of interest is around blog communities (as I mentioned before here in the context of BusinessWeek’s b-school community developed by 21Publish), and how the dialogue surrounding these types of structures seems different to me.
I do not know the answer to the general question of how to reduce information overload most effectively (I have resorted to dropping feeds and adding new ones). But I will say that I suspect the blogosphere (and the web in general) does not pay enough attention to holes and gaps in information (e.g., can we create maps of worlds readers are missing). We also tend not to pay enough attention to distortions created by circular linking, information reduction, reinforcing lists, etc. Perhaps not mainstream concerns in the blogosphere, but I know that these types of pitfalls have to be avoided in business in general. Why should use of the blogosphere be any different?
Technorati Tags: blog, blogging, tagging, RSS, feeds
Update (11/1/05): Bill Burnham has a post on Feed Overload Syndrome.
I thought I would relate a case I had in a startup situation where I had felt that I had reached the lowest point in my personal and professional life. I was really choked up, and it was probably the first time I have ever had something mental shut me down physically. But I think this case also reflects some aspects creativeness and caution that are bred into people working for startups.
I was contacted by an individual in Caracas, Venezuela. We’ll call him Mr. P. Mr. P. purportedly has a background in the enterprise software market and connections into the financial services space, a sector very ripe for my company’s product. Through pure chance, I happen to talk with one of our sales directors who actually has worked with Mr. P in the past. The past experience with Mr. P was positive. The prior company (in the same market space) got a number of high-level meetings with customer prospects and a mini-roadshow in Venezuela. One deal actually came though and was signed. Trick, however, was that Mr. P wanted his sales commission up-front (i.e., before receipt of first payment from customer). To make a long story short, the key person that signed the deal at prospective customer changed jobs, and the vendor lost the deal. Mr. P., part of a population where the economy is under terrible duress, no longer had the money to pay back the vendor. Our current sales director still speaks very highly of Mr. P.
So I decide to move forward. What does that mean? Well in a startup situation, and especially in cases where you do not have the Board’s blessing to pursue international speculation, you either need to get cash up-front or do a commission-only based deal. Went with later approach here. Additionally, I did not agree to pay for any expenses. Let’s get things rolling first.
I start to have a number of phone conferences with prospective partners (e.g., IBM distributors) and customer prospects. Mr. P. prepares some good presentations for us, and I verify some of the phone calls, discussions, and exchanges with people I know, people who have done business in Latin America. I even use informal networking to get connected to folks at IBM who manage the Latin America operations, tell me things about doing business there, and can verify that the people I am talking with as IBM distributors are actually IBM distributors. Early on, I also get introduced to a Mr. V. who is supposed to be able to broker additional connections, but on my first call, I wasn’t so sure about the fit.
A few weeks into the various calls (I never traveled to Venezuela btw), Mr. P. starts to indicate to me that he needs an advance of money. The highballing starts to come on strong. He has set up conference calls, cannot pay for food to eat, traveled to different parts of Latin America, etc., and I have not sent a single cent to him. I consult with our director of sales. Compressing things a bit, I am still cautious, so I roll out phase 2 of my "jerk manager" approach. I tell him that I cannot advance any money, but that I will send up to $750 in three pieces (perhaps not the exact amounts), and that each piece is tied to a milestone: e.g., phone conference with customer (both business and technical contacts), verification of pilot install of software, and signed order form (of a qualified, credit-checked customer) for training. He say "great". OK.
We almost complete through the second milestone, but have some issues with the Java virtual machine implementation in the IBM AS/400 environment.
Then something happens out of the blue. Mr. P’s son has been in a motorcycle accident. He will lose his arm if he does not get surgery. Mr. P. does not want to take his son to a public hospital, but wants to take him to a private one. Please advance the rest of the $750. Offline, I call the special crimes division of the FBI to see if they’ve ever heard of this one before. No guidance there. But they do have four full-time people manning the customer services lines to handle the Nigerian email scam. FBI says to me that they can’t make any recommendations here, but that it sounds like I’m doing all of the forward and backward chacking I can.
In the end I try to console Mr. P., but I also indicate that it is not my money to advance. It is shareholders’ money. I ask to let me speak to the doctor and the hospital. I say that I am not comfortable advancing money to him directly, but will pay the hospital directly, using some of my own money. He says OK. To make a long story short again, I get one of my friends that can help with the language to connect me to the hospital. I go through a number of different departments, and finally get so caught up with transfers, that I spare my friend the rest of his time with helping me out pro-bono. I ask Mr. P. why I cannot reach the person at the hospital, he says to call Dr. V.
In the midst of all this is where the low point happens. Mr. P. calls me out of the blue. He is sobbing. He tells me that he had to take his son to the public hospital for immediate surgery or the arm would be lost, but it turns out that his son has died.
It is even hard for me to recall how I felt at that moment, but I felt directly responsible for the death of his son. I had not advanced money to take him to the private hospital. While I had moved quickly to verify circumstances, it seemed as if I was not rapid enough. My mind and body shut down for 24 hours.
A few days later, Mr. P. tells me not to worry, that he will be gone for about a week to bury his son.
My mind starts to work again eventually. Hmm. V is a name I’ve heard before. Where have I heard that name? Let me scan my address book. There’s a Mr. V. that is a business development person. But what’s this? Dr. V (the scheduled surgeon for Mr. P’s son) has the same telephone number as Mr. V. Now V is a common name, but this seems odd. I eventually try to mention this to Mr. P. He has no explanation other than in his distraught mental state he must have confused things.
Mr. P. and I never seemed to trust one another after that series of incidents. Our business ended, and the company shareholders were out $250 and about 2 weeks of my time in paid salary. To this day, I do not know whether Mr. P’s son had died. Mr. P. let me know that it was not my fault though. One of my close friends told me that I need to see the movie, "The Spanish Prisoner". Probably both Mr. P. and my friend are right.
The title of the blog post is Art Hutchinson’s. He has a very touching post about the recent loss of his brother to cancer at the young age of 39. Posts like his really put life into perspective. It also sheds light on the importance of early diagnosis and the rapid attention to changing health conditions of loved ones. Finally, for those who have not had to go through such an ordeal, it sheds light on the hopes at stake (in fact, on the line every day) for better, faster research. My condolences to Art and his family. I’m sure that many others, like myself, would only hope to have a supportive extended family like his in times of need.