Finally Getting Used To Tech.Memeorandum

Having followed tech.memeorandum casually for a couple of months, I’m getting a little more used to its user interface. The politics thread is here, and the technology one is here (the latter being the only one I’ve traveled).

The one problem that I have had with the user interface for memeorandum is that I don’t generally consider myself to be a news junkie or maven that combs through copius amounts of internet information.

But I am finding that the tool can be useful to help me find information clusters on current topics. It is helping me to locate other information sources more passively and to determine whether my current list of information sources may be lacking in any way. New sites might benefit by having this type of interface.

What has been difficult for me to assess, however, is how high quality is the main thread of information that travels through tech.memeorandum? Just because there is a lot of dialogue around topics picked up by tech.memeorandum does not mean I will have much  interest in any of the main threads. Would be interesting if the main thread could be more customizable or trainable. Alternatively, if the main thread had coverage reputation like a mainstream media publication, then I would commit more eyeball time to the site.

Pondering Executive Severance Clauses And Search Times

J. Rextor has an interesting annecdotal comment at his b-school blog at BusinessWeek, where he is using his blog to recount the experience of searching for a new executive position within a firm. The comment is:

… I did receive an email back from one of [executive recruiters] that stated it takes
approximately 3.2 years for most executives to find an upwardly mobile
executive position in another company.

I have not really had much appreciation for the personal value and legitimacy of executive severance clauses until the past few years where I have seen a number of friends have to find new jobs at senior levels. If one is faced with the situation of having to leave a situation of a good fit with a prior firm, it can be hard to get the balance right again when looking for a new job. At higher-levels, awesome positions can be scarce to come by, and severance compensation can be viewed as consideration for longer job search times for like-level positions. That said, and while I’m no compensation expert, 3.2 years does seem pretty high to me. I’d have to sample some other executive recruiters for feedback, but I’m pretty certain that their cycle time must be shorter than this for placement of executives (guessing 12 months?).

Forget The Cluetrain, Return To Seminal Works Of Information Theory Of The 40s

Posts by Umair Haque, Fred Wilson, and Jeff Nolan are all talking about the looming attention crisis (see here & here) related to information overload and the blogosphere. Wilson captures Umair’s words:

Herbert Simon said it in 1971, which is that "What does an abundance of information create?" A scarcity of attention basically, right?

It’s funny that blogging is starting to replace email conversations (based on ROI), yet we are still in overload. I, for one, peaked out at reading between 50 and 100 feeds, and I needed to start to drop some and add others as my work balance shifted.

For those may not know, blogging was heavily influenced the seminal blogging work, "The Cluetrain Manifesto". The takeaway saying from that work has been "markets are conversations".

But I think with the doubling of the blogosphere hand over fist (with no end in sight on the graphical charts) we are starting to see some limits as to what people can process.

That is why I think we will see a return to works that preceded the Cluetrain by 50-60 some years in the 1940s. These are the seminal works of Claude Shannon on information theory, and much of his work was written in plain English without having to be decorated with tons of mathematics. We may find inspiration in solving some of our new problems from the information theory and related fields.

Some key items from the field of information theory:

  • The essence of information can only be reduced so far before the content is distorted. This concept became known as the entropy bound. Entropy can be thought of as an energy-level contained within a message.
  • Smart guys like Huffman (at Stanford when he did his master’s thesis if I recall correctly) developed algorithms for organizing information so that it could be reduced using probabilities. More frequently occuring information or data patterns (i.e., higher probability items) would be encoded using short patterns (likely shorter than their original length). Less frequently occuring data patterns would be encoded using longer patterns, perhaps even longer than their original length. The net effect of structuring things in total around a probability-oriented tree was to increase efficiency of information transfer (e.g., compress information sent over a modem).
  • A channel (such as a data pipe into the home, or perhaps likened to that of a blog reader’s maximum ability to process information) had to have as much capacity as the entropy.
  • No message could be compressed beyond the entropy bound or it would be distorted (i.e., data lost).
  • But a new field grew out of this area, called rate distortion theory. Rate distortion theory enabled people to compress (and hence, process) information even better. The side effects were that one needed to control where distortion occurred. For example, much of the music contained on an iPod is not an exact reproduction of the bits and bytes on an original compact disk. At risk of trivializing the process of getting that information onto an iPod, data and information has been thrown out or trimmed from the song. That said, the audio folks try to use knowledge of the ear, hearing, music reproduction, etc. to shape the noise and distortion into an area where people don’t care (e.g., in some audio processing systems, perhaps where the average person can’t hear imperfections, such as above 15kHz frequency where certain cymbal overtones occur).

The blogosphere faces similar challenges in terms of capacity limitations, means for improving efficiency, and information distortion.

Feedreaders can speed the process of reading blogs. I’m guessing my efficiency in reading news went up 50%+ after shifting to a feedreader.

At some point though, I ran out of channel bandwidth using this method. What to do then?

Well as folks like Andrew have pointed out (as does Jeff Nolan in his post), people do a lot of linking to the same posts. Good case for unsubscribing to A-list blogs because you get the same information everywhere. But I suppose that the unsubscribing method for reducing information may create some distortion. One is not getting info straight from the horse’s mouth so to speak.

Other methods, such as using web services to aggregate tags (as recently contracted by Nivi) are also a way to reduce information. But I suppose that this method could create distortion in that one is seeking information that tends to be the same as what you’ve always sought out in the past.

Another area of interest is around blog communities (as I mentioned before here in the context of BusinessWeek’s b-school community developed by 21Publish), and how the dialogue surrounding these types of structures seems different to me.

I do not know the answer to the general question of how to reduce information overload most effectively (I have resorted to dropping feeds and adding new ones). But I will say that I suspect the blogosphere (and the web in general) does not pay enough attention to holes and gaps in information (e.g., can we create maps of worlds readers are missing). We also tend not to pay enough attention to distortions created by circular linking, information reduction, reinforcing lists, etc. Perhaps not mainstream concerns in the blogosphere, but I know that these types of pitfalls have to be avoided in business in general. Why should use of the blogosphere be any different?

Technorati Tags: , , , ,

Update (11/1/05): Bill Burnham has a post on Feed Overload Syndrome.

Jerk Manager Or Lessons From The Spanish Prisoner? (Long Post)

I thought I would relate a case I had in a startup situation where I had felt that I had reached the lowest point in my personal and professional life. I was really choked up, and it was probably the first time I have ever had something mental shut me down physically. But I think this case also reflects some aspects creativeness and caution that are bred into people working for startups.

I was contacted by an individual in Caracas, Venezuela. We’ll call him Mr. P. Mr. P. purportedly has a background in the enterprise software market and connections into the financial services space, a sector very ripe for my company’s product. Through pure chance, I happen to talk with one of our sales directors who actually has worked with Mr. P in the past. The past experience with Mr. P was positive. The prior company (in the same market space) got a number of high-level meetings with customer prospects and a mini-roadshow in Venezuela. One deal actually came though and was signed. Trick, however, was that Mr. P wanted his sales commission up-front (i.e., before receipt of first payment from customer). To make a long story short, the key person that signed the deal at prospective customer changed jobs, and the vendor lost the deal. Mr. P., part of a population where the economy is under terrible duress, no longer had the money to pay back the vendor. Our current sales director still speaks very highly of Mr. P.

So I decide to move forward. What does that mean? Well in a startup situation, and especially in cases where you do not have the Board’s blessing to pursue international speculation, you either need to get cash up-front or do a commission-only based deal. Went with later approach here. Additionally, I did not agree to pay for any expenses. Let’s get things rolling first.

I start to have a number of phone conferences with prospective partners (e.g., IBM distributors) and customer prospects. Mr. P. prepares some good presentations for us, and I verify some of the phone calls, discussions, and exchanges with people I know, people who have done business in Latin America. I even use informal networking to get connected to folks at IBM who manage the Latin America operations, tell me things about doing business there, and can verify that the people I am talking with as IBM distributors are actually IBM distributors. Early on, I also get introduced to a Mr. V. who is supposed to be able to broker additional connections, but on my first call, I wasn’t so sure about the fit.

A few weeks into the various calls (I never traveled to Venezuela btw), Mr. P. starts to indicate to me that he needs an advance of money. The highballing starts to come on strong. He has set up conference calls, cannot pay for food to eat, traveled to different parts of Latin America, etc., and I have not sent a single cent to him. I consult with our director of sales. Compressing things a bit, I am still cautious, so I roll out phase 2 of my "jerk manager" approach. I tell him that I cannot advance any money, but that I will send up to $750 in three pieces (perhaps not the exact amounts), and that each piece is tied to a milestone: e.g., phone conference with customer (both business and technical contacts), verification of pilot install of software, and signed order form (of a qualified, credit-checked customer) for training. He say "great". OK.

We almost complete through the second milestone, but have some issues with the Java virtual machine implementation in the IBM AS/400 environment.

Then something happens out of the blue. Mr. P’s son has been in a motorcycle accident. He will lose his arm if he does not get surgery. Mr. P. does not want to take his son to a public hospital, but wants to take him to a private one. Please advance the rest of the $750. Offline, I call the special crimes division of the FBI to see if they’ve ever heard of this one before. No guidance there. But they do have four full-time people manning the customer services lines to handle the Nigerian email scam. FBI says to me that they can’t make any recommendations here, but that it sounds like I’m doing all of the forward and backward chacking I can.

In the end I try to console Mr. P., but I also indicate that it is not my money to advance. It is shareholders’ money. I ask to let me speak to the doctor and the hospital. I say that I am not comfortable advancing money to him directly, but will pay the hospital directly, using some of my own money. He says OK. To make a long story short again, I get one of my friends that can help with the language to connect me to the hospital. I go through a number of different departments, and finally get so caught up with transfers, that I spare my friend the rest of his time with helping me out pro-bono. I ask Mr. P. why I cannot reach the person at the hospital, he says to call Dr. V.

In the midst of all this is where the low point happens. Mr. P. calls me out of the blue. He is sobbing. He tells me that he had to take his son to the public hospital for immediate surgery or the arm would be lost, but it turns out that his son has died.

It is even hard for me to recall how I felt at that moment, but I felt directly responsible for the death of his son. I had not advanced money to take him to the private hospital. While I had moved quickly to verify circumstances, it seemed as if I was not rapid enough. My mind and body shut down for 24 hours.

A few days later, Mr. P. tells me not to worry, that he will be gone for about a week to bury his son.

My mind starts to work again eventually. Hmm. V is a name I’ve heard before. Where have I heard that name? Let me scan my address book. There’s a Mr. V. that is a business development person. But what’s this? Dr. V (the scheduled surgeon for Mr. P’s son) has the same telephone number as Mr. V. Now V is a common name, but this seems odd. I eventually try to mention this to Mr. P. He has no explanation other than in his distraught mental state he must have confused things.

Mr. P. and I never seemed to trust one another after that series of incidents. Our business ended, and the company shareholders were out $250 and about 2 weeks of my time in paid salary. To this day, I do not know whether Mr. P’s son had died. Mr. P. let me know that it was not my fault though. One of my close friends told me that I need to see the movie, "The Spanish Prisoner". Probably both Mr. P. and my friend are right.

Cancer Research – Limits and Hopes

The title of the blog post is Art Hutchinson’s. He has a very touching post about the recent loss of his brother to cancer at the young age of 39. Posts like his really put life into perspective. It also sheds light on the importance of early diagnosis and the rapid attention to changing health conditions of loved ones. Finally, for those who have not had to go through such an ordeal, it sheds light on the hopes at stake (in fact, on the line every day) for better, faster research. My condolences to Art and his family. I’m sure that many others, like myself, would only hope to have a supportive extended family like his in times of need.

Intranet Blogging: More On Impacting Organizational Culture

This post has been reproduced from my 21Publish blog.

Intranet blogging (see earlier 21Publish whitepaper here [PDF file]) seems to be gaining momentum by companies that are looking to imbue and discuss culture in private settings. In a prior post, I mentioned how a major US bank is using blogs by 21Publish to discuss leadership and company culture.

Today, I learned from Shel Holtz’s blog that McDonald’s now has an intranet blog. According to Shel, Steve Wilson, the burger company’s senior director of web communications, addressed a crowd at Blog On:

"If your task is to move the culture of a company, you’re
not going to move it by the flip of a switch,” Wilson said. “You have
to show that an open dialogue can occur, and create an ongoing dialogue
to move from point A to point B."

Culture change is something that I’ve not heard explicitly discussed in mainstream corporate settings since the mid 90s, but it seems to be coming back into vogue. Blogs could be the internal desktop memo of days past.

Other very recent news in the blog intranet space … the NewPR Wiki just started a CEO Intranet Blogs list.

CorporateBlogging.Info also has a very recent post on using intranet blogs for knowledge management in a corporation. Just last week I had a discussion with a major telecom company about using blogs in the context of KM. Perfect use-case just coming of age. I suspect it has to do in part with the fact that blogging has been legitimized if only for the medium’s impact in organizing discussions more effectively than email. Additionally, some companies just aren’t ready organizationally (culturally) to handle the external messaging aspects of blogging, but they are more than ready to try things in a private/secure environment.

To change gears a bit, some things we have found at 21Publish is that customers like the ability to have hosted blogging intranets that support the following:

  • dedicated server integrated with company’s specific firewall considerations
  • workflows restricted by blog community manager to prevent confidential posts from going public
  • shared server, secure blog intranet (not custom integrated with organization’s firewall)
  • restricted admin of reader groups
  • traceable conversations and comment tracking within the community
  • automated sign-up and administration of bloggers with varying levels of control and which permit registrations only from certain domain names (e.g., companyxyz.com).

So I am seeing more momentum on intranet blogging than I have seen in the past. What are you seeing?

Technorati Tags: , , ,

Benefits Of Little Experiments And Figuring Out How People Perceive You

One of the most important lessons I learned from an angel investor in a prior venture I worked with was that of conducting test experiments. This might be as sophisticated as a split-cable marketing study where one delivers one segment or audience one type of message and another segment (randomly split) another type of message. See what results come from each segment. Analyze and come up with hypotheses why things are so. Go back and test and refine things.

What the angel investor taught me, however, was that I could get by with conducting some of this testing in more of an ad-hoc way without having to follow the rigor and statistical nature required in full-blown business experiments learned in business schools, etc. So long as I was disciplined, somewhat systematic, and could rely on my business instincts, this would get me in the ballpark and moving in the right direction.

To change gears a little, one way I have applied the ad-hoc testing technique is to get continuous feedback on myself as a business professional.

What is interesting about the blog world, it that one can get some feedback on how one is perceived by others. Through my blog postings, I have seen people refer to me in online contexts as:

  • management consultant
  • entrepreneur
  • operating manager/executive

In my case, the balance has been weighed more toward the first two in the list as opposed to the third one. It is also interesting because I do not consider myself an entrepreneur. I have supported entrepreneurs and been in entrepreneurial contexts, but I have not yet been that first person in the company to conceive of a business idea. I have had to earn my status in entrepreneurial contexts (e.g., through the earliest sales in an org. or through market guidance).

How one is perceived is very useful information to have when selling oneself into a job or consulting gig, say. It is also good to be aware of this in persuation-type situations (e.g., some people may perceive you to be more skilled as an entrepreneur when you really need to position yourself as a management consultant).

To complement the online feedback I’ve processed, in offline settings, I have gotten some feedback over the years on how people perceive me:

  • From a venture partner, ex-partner at well-known VC fund in South – classic bio and make-up of an entrepreneur, perhaps not naturally inclined but capable to be a position-player in business development
  • From a CFO – great people facilitator with excellent communication skills, maybe a little weaker on accounting detail than what needed for this engagement
  • From an entrepreneur – type of person needed for strategic finance issues and operating model considerations
  • From a CFO – would be good at a controller position in a finance organization because of an ability to tie finance with communication skills, may need to shore up skills in detailed accounting.
  • From a technical person – personality more of a Kellogg-type than a Chicago-type MBA (ouch?)
  • From angel investors – a trusted, right-hand man
  • From a client entrepreneur – significantly stronger on product development/management & business development as compared to online marketing
  • From an entrepreneur – much more of a corporate-type as opposed to an entrepreneur (little negative?), good at driving structure in an org. though
  • From a generalist-type executive in a multi-billion dollar firm – you are a generalist and a glue person that holds things together as opposed to being a front-person
  • From a client/middle-market company – well-suited for change management/management consulting engagements that require working with all levels in an org. (i.e., not just executives but line workers)
  • From a client/middle-market company – excellent at bringing management consulting-grade analytics and front-end, project management discipline to the table
  • From a friend – not the makeup of a financial analyst
  • From an angel investor – a terrible writer, but very good at picking an angle and delivering messages from that context
  • From strangers – a good go-to resource on management consulting and business schools

What is very funny to me about this list is that I never ever pictured myself in business development (prior to business school), but somehow people perceive me that way and see me in that role.

The bottom-line is that by getting this type of feedback, it becomes easier to know how one stacks up against others in a professional context.

By using this technique, I have made some choices to de-emphasize my efforts in pursuing financial-type endeavors. Continue to focus on opportunities that will require me to interface with all types of people. Defer functional specialization as a general rule but keep watching the trends. Focus more on management consulting, people facilitation, product management, start-up and business development opportunities.

As an aside, in addition to asking others how they perceive me, I have also asked my son how he perceives me. It is a good feeling when he responds, "You’re my buddy." I have to take that feedback and keep life in balance too.