The Sometimes Forgotten Wake of WorldCom

Having spent a good amount of time in the telecommunications industry from the late 80s through the 90s, I remember when WorldCom rose out of nowhere to become a darling in the industry. With Bernard Ebbers recent conviction, it has been easy to focus on WorldCom only. Then I run across an ePrairie column (a Chicago tech newsletter) by James Carlini (a Northwestern professor) that reminds me of the greater wake (bold emphasis is mine) …

While AT&T should have been
the least-cost provider due to its network infrastructure, the company
was baffled on how WorldCom could keep cutting and showing more
revenues. In trying to keep up by cutting quality of service and job
stability, the whole industry imploded. Cutting costs cut into quality.
If you don’t believe that, ask any customer or former employee.

Wisdom and Encouragement

Ego off and true WISDOM revealed. Seth puts it real well. Perhaps the greatest blog post I have seen all year (either that or he’s caught me at the right moment where I am not fuming over the "30 books & sidestep the MBA" blog post roll he’s on).  😉

For a definition of the Long Tail, go here.

Good Post on Why Blogging Doesn’t Matter for Your Career

Entertaining read that I was made aware of via Seth Godin’s blog. When considering whether to blog (or to do anything that has consequences for that matter) it is important to look for both confirming evidence and disconfirming evidence that supports your hypothesis or position. This post takes a look at the other side of the coin.

Anyway, here’s my two favorites segments of the post:

  • 3. It really impresses people when you say "Oh, I’ve written about
    that, just google for XXX and I’m on the top page" or "Oh, just google
    my name."

    No, it doesn’t, it just makes you look like a dork …

  • 5. Bloggers are better-informed than non-bloggers. Knowing more is a career advantage.

    Balderdash. Bloggers are not necessarily better-informed. They might
    be more focused or be the first to publish the facts, but they are too
    often ignorant of the wider picture (no matter what the subject matter)
    or the consequences of writing what they do…

Exponential Growth in Blogs But More Linear Growth in Page Views?

Dave Sifry has got a great post on the state of the blogosphere. Very noteworthy is an interesting discussion on the emergence of spam blogs.

What is not shocking to me is the exponential-type growth of the number of blogs, where the number of blogs appears to double every five months. Some in the blogosphere have noted potential artifacts in the measurement process. Perhaps so. Probably so. But hey, I’m not sure where one can get better data at this stage of the game.

What is more perplexing to me is the closer to linear daily page view growth that I see via Alexa for TypePad (one of the blog platform market leaders). Would be interesting to normalize # of page views by # of active blogs.

I am looking forward to Dave’s upcoming post on posting volume for blogs. Although this is separate from page view growth, maybe this will help me to reconcile in my mind where the overall blogging market is going and who is going to get squeezed.

Update (3/15/05): Dave has new post on posting volume. Posting volume looks closer to linear to me. Whew!

Steve Shu

Continue reading “Exponential Growth in Blogs But More Linear Growth in Page Views?”

Trash Talking the MBA Degree Again

Seth Godin (Stanford MBA, bestselling author, entrepreneur and also evangelist in my book [see my side links]) is trash talking the MBA degree, and it’s quite entertaining. What I find hilarious is his comment (emphasis added by me):

An MBA has become a two-part time machine. First, the students are
taught everything they need to know to manage a company from 1990, and
second, they are taken out of the real world for two years while the
rest of us race as fast as we possibly can.

Now as a Chicago MBA, I’ve hinted (with some tongue in cheek too), that there are ways my clients can bypass the MBA.

That said, I feel that I really should come to the defense of the MBA degree because it has become the butt of many jokes of bloggers and professionals I respect like Om Malik and Jeff Nolan (not to mention Seth).

For those that are considering the degree seriously, off the top of my head there are some areas of the MBA that are harder to bypass via book reading:

  • finance and accounting (introductory through entrepreneurial finance, analysis, etc.)
  • operations
  • negotiations.

Taking courses in these areas is generally much more complementary to both real-world experience and book reading than other subjects in the MBA program (IMHO). My mention of negotiations may be a bit of a surprising one, but negotiations may be one of the most underrated subjects in business schools. I can think of no other setting where you will have the opportunity to participate in controlled negotiations settings where you can find out your score and ability to negotiate in different situations. Many of the negotiation cases are built on game theory foundations, and there are measurably right answers, less right answers, and wrong answers. Anyway, if you want to bypass the MBA degree, consider taking courses in these areas (for example, I know a number of experienced execs that would feel more comfortable if they had more formal training in finance).

I think that it also noteworthy to mention that most people don’t realize that many of the people who want to get an MBA want to switch careers. While it is debatable whether you need this type of degree for management consulting or investment banking from an actual skillset point of view (beyond just having the stamp of approval), many will have an easier time switching jobs with an MBA stamp as opposed to marketing oneself as having read 30-40 books.

Other things I’m only going to mention briefly are the importance of alumni networks and having additional confidence, endurance, and resolve on the job. Places like Harvard are known to be boot camps and the West Point of business schools. There’s a lot said for practicing in the gym so to speak and defending business positions unto death in the classroom.

Now the MBA isn’t for everyone. I’ve also hinted that there are some areas where you can bypass the degree. I’ve also been known to say that the MBA is no substitute for real work experience. But I’m a tad softer on this issue than Seth.

Update (3/15/05): Based on comment from Jeff, I want to clarify the commentary I made about Om, Jeff, and Seth above with respect to ragging on the MBA. In my haste to post, I should not have pointed at them specifically. To go further, I may have characterized their stance on the MBA inaccurately, and I am glad that Jeff clarifies below. The MBA is under a bit of heat as of late as I indicated in a prior post (here another Economist article I missed as well). Seems like little defense for the MBA degree has been put up to date (which is the real reason for my post).

Steve Shu

Related posts: here and here.

Affirmative Action for Bloggers?

Link to a friend in need. But do we know what we are talking about here in terms of demographics?

And I thought tea leaf reading was hard. Anyway, since metablogging is not cool anymore … that’s all.

(*) Some people cited in this MSNBC article talk about highlighting minorities in
need of having their voices better heard. Given that blogging is turning out to be a new communications medium, I suppose the concerns are valid, but it does feel a little weird on first blush.

Blogads Survey Results

Steve Rubel points me to results of the recent Blogads survey, which surveyed more than 30,000 readers of blogs. Steve points out some good items that caught his interest. Some different items that jump out at me include:

  • question #14 regarding why people read blogs … 75.3% responded that it was for "News I can’t find elsewhere",
  • question #11 indicated that the median number of blogs read daily is five, and
  • question #12 indicated that in an average week the median hours spent reading a blog was 10 hours per week.

I’m sure there’s some measurement error here, but putting on my propeller head nevertheless, that’s 2 hours per week per blog. On the surface, a lot of eyeball time and a lot of unmet needs being met by some blogs.

Steve Shu
Managing Director, S4 Management Group