Personal Experience: How MBAs and Non-Profits Can “Profit” From One Another

Prior to my move to Dallas last year, I spent three years (voluntary work) in the capacity of the finance officer on the board of a non-profit organization (that provided child care). My experience at the non-profit was post-MBA and post management consulting with PRTM. I got a lot out of the experience, and I was honored to be able to contribute to the organization.

What I got out of it:

  • I found that non-profit boards tend to be more diverse than corporate boards – the experience forced me to learn how to minimize MBA jargon talk and the like.
  • The board size was much larger and decoupled than one might find with boards of many corporate organizations (twelve people versus three to five) – the experience forced me to continue to refine facilitation skills because large boards can be cumbersome.
  • It was often easier to connect finance with both the human policy and vision of the organization – governance at the board-level directly affected children and families (some of which are very disadvantaged [e.g., single moms, low income]), and it was gratifying to get the organization to points of commitment and resolve.
  • I learned to appreciate the need for a separate operating board versus a fund raising board (something more typical of non-profit organizations).

There many things that one can bring to table for non-profits. As examples of some MBA concepts that I applied:

  • Operations background – Assume that many manufacturing facilities operate at a normal load of 70% utilization. Now consider an organization like a child care organization that is make or break based on child enrollment numbers and where the budgeted numbers for the organization require breakeven to be 95% of capacity. Does this raise a warning flag that a correction is needed somewhere?
  • Operations and competitive strategy – Suppose there are long waiting lists (queues) for the two-year old rooms in the facility and that capacity in the surrounding, competitive facilities is scarce. What does this like say about the price sensitivity of the market (i.e., how much the organization can raise enrollment prices)? Probably one can raise prices more than one thinks.
  • Marketing – Other organizations are marketing lower prices yet they hide the fact that their coverage hours are shorter. How does your organization want to position itself in the market from a competitive viewpoint, and what concrete tactical things could be improved to make sure that people are educated about comparing apples to apples? Perhaps the organization should market itself as value-based, full-service and draw out the differences in a nice chart.
  • Finance and Controller – When the financial situation gets tough, it becomes easy to want to take out small things (like water coolers), but where the dollar impact is small. Attack the problem from a different angle – first attack the problem from a "required hurdle perspective" as opposed to "a triage perspective". Use MBA spreadsheet, multimedia projector, and meeting facilitation skills to get the group on the same page as to how many dollars actually need to be cut out of the budget to affect the monthly enrollment fee for each family. Then come back and triage the budget at the line-level.
  • Board governance – Non-profit boards can frequently benefit from practices used at the board-level in for-profit companies. Things like knowing about by-laws, employment laws, handling conflict of interest, etc. in the commercial sector can be adapted to the non-profit world.

For what it’s worth, I would highly recommend that MBAs look for ways to apply their skills to non-profit organizations to whatever extent they can. Some business schools like Yale have reputations for being strong in the non-profit sector, but straight-up MBAs are also good. The relationship with non-profit boards can be as little or as much as you want in many cases. The upside is good for all parties involved. You can’t always find that in the commercial sector.

Steve Shu

Don’t forget to subscribe to Steve Shu’s blog now (click icon)! Business and technology information for everyone.

BlogKits – Advertising Matchmaking for Blogs

Found BlogKits via Anita Campbell at her Small Business Trends blog. According to the BlogKits site:

The BlogKits BlogMatchTM Network is an opportunity for anyone who owns a blog to be matched with businesses, marketers and/or advertisers looking to partner with niche-filled, content specific, quality blogs.

Have little clue what the deal structure with BlogKits is like. Perhaps I will explore.

Regarding advertising, I’ve personally stayed away from Google AdSense on my personal blog because I imagined it would be hard for me to control what would pop up in front of users (note BlogKits would provide an alternative option). When I first started blogging, my initial objections were that I might have competitive management consulting firms popping up on my site. That concern has since diffused because as an independent consultant, I find I rarely cross paths with the larger firms except when dealing with the $200 million+ revenue firms. I also look to establish longer-term trust relationships that would tend to steer me clear of competitive kinds of situations. Even then, I have held the belief that my flavor of consulting is unique – I appeal to types looking for a versatile right-hand man and trusted mercenary (for lack of better words).

Anyhow, I ended up writing a bit of a long-winded post when I simply wanted to introduce a new option for folks that are trying to monetize their readership. If people have thoughts, I’d be happy to hear them.

Steve Shu

Don’t forget to subscribe to Steve Shu’s blog now (click icon)!

Preparing Children for the Offshoring Revolution

In the past month I’ve blogged twice about offshoring and outsourcing.

In the first post, I summarized some key points in a BusinessWeek article about the outsourcing of innovation. From a skills perspective, it may have had some interest from those involved with orchestrating supply chains. Perhaps a bit of a narrow focus.

In the second post, I tried to draw in some additional focus on how significant the offshoring force will be on the overall economy. That might have drawn some interest from professionals looking out for themselves as to how to keep their skills fresh. A bit broader of an audience.

Here’s something also close to home but not necessarily directly associated with the aspects of keeping skills fresh and worrying about where jobs will go. The topic is how to make sure your children are adequately prepared for the global future with language skills. May be more important now than ever given the offshoring revolution I described. May also be a good domestic business opportunity for those that can be more aggressive with providing language tutorial services, value-added services, or lower-cost services to the youth market.

A quote from the article that triggered this post ("Great Toddle Forward"):

JaNiece Rush of Lifestyle Resources, a placement agency, says 35
percent more families have requested Mandarin-speaking nannies this
year than last. At the Pavillion Agency, requests for Mandarin-speaking
sitters are up tenfold since 2000, says Clifford Greenhouse, mainly
from “extremely affluent” parents. Some of these parents are Chinese or
have adopted Chinese babies. But others want to give their toddlers a
leg up in globalized society.

Timing for children on the language front is more critical that other learning areas. For me, I can only speak English. I waited until graduate school to take Mandarin – it’s hard to learn that late in life – and it would not be possible for me to conduct business in China without being immersed much more. So keep language in the back of your mind as you think about your kids. Transferring preconceived ideas from one’s own past about language may less relevant given globalization.

Steve Shu

Don’t forget to subscribe to Steve Shu’s blog now (click icon)!

EVDB – The Next Hot Talk in Event and Calendar Management

Ross Mayfield (CEO of Socialtext) has a good post on the new EVDB demo plus a little background on EVDB’s recent Series A venture financing of $2.1M. EVDB is a maker of an Events and Venues Database. I remember learning about event and calendaring stuff back in December of last year and thought that the area was pretty cool and had a potential value proposition of simplifying people’s lives. Scott McMullan (now with JotSpot) had a good post back then entitled "Google/Internet Archive, Meet Mr. Event," that summarized the emerging area and some of the pertinent technologies surrounding calendaring and event management. Back then, I also remember exchanging some email with Brian Dear (Founder of EVDB). Started to follow both Brian’s postings about raising capital for EVDB shortly after that time and his tribulations with installing QuickBooks. It’s great to see that Brian lined up the financing. As for the QuickBooks stuff, I don’t recall whether he is a fan, but I am.

Steve Shu

Don’t forget to subscribe to Steve Shu’s blog now (click icon)!

Interesting Post on Stock Options and Milestone Vesting

Paul Allen has an interesting post on vesting stock options based on milestones as opposed to by date. In early-stage ventures, I have seen a few forms of this type of compensation applied. In some cases, it can be implemented via vesting schedules, via controlling the grant itself, or combinations thereof (depending on the style of the stock option plan and infrastructure in place). The mechanics can involve varying levels of modifications to stock option agreement forms, employment agreement forms, letter agreements, job descriptions, board documents, etc.

Hard for me to make any generalizations, but I would say while in concept it seems very desirable, that in practice I have found it to be administratively burdensome if you take it too far or try to tailor it too much. I would probably make the same comment about non-stock option based (i.e., cash-based) project-level incentive structures as well. These can be hard to administer, keep fair, keep expectations in alignment, etc. especially if situations change during the course of a project or doing business. Maybe I’ve had good luck in that I’ve tended to work with intrinsically-motivated people though.

I have mixed feelings on this subject because one clearly wants to motivate people using whatever means possible. That said, to me the marginal benefits of having very tailored bonus compensation seems … well at times marginal and not remarkable.

Steve Shu

Don’t forget to subscribe to Steve Shu’s blog now (click icon)!

Cartoon Characters Blogging in the Corporate World

I’m always so serious about stuff, especially when it comes to business. I’ve made some comments about CEOs blogging, trench workers blogging, and hybrid models. Completely forgot the aspect of cartoon characters blogging for corporations. Steve Rubel and his readership points me to GEICO’s Gecko blog and Captain Morgan’s blog (Now there’s a way to circumvent all of the corporate policy legal stuff … blame things on a cartoon character when things don’t go well!).

So in the cartoon spirit, I just thought I’d share how I feel when I mess up a blog post or comment and can’t retract … (click here). (Source: Netdisaster). Hat tip: Suzanne.

Steve Shu

Don’t forget to subscribe to Steve Shu’s blog now (click icon)!

Fred Wilson on Bubble 2.0

Very coincidental that related to my prior posts on financial markets and "The Wisdom of Crowds" that venture capitalist Fred Wilson posts about the potential of Bubble 2.0 contrasted by the real promises of Web 2.0. Is Fred thin-slicing what he is seeing and applying tacit knowledge to hint about the dangers ahead? Are free markets always wise?

I really like Fred’s closing comments:

I don’t have any good answers to these problems, but I’ll say this:

If you were at the first party, then you should never forget how it felt when it was over. 

Drink responsibly this time.

I was planning on posting something I missed before (in a
managerial-decision making post) on forward thinking about regret to
assist with decisions
. Fred’s comments are a good example forward thinking about regret to resolve a decision that can’t be rigorously reasoned out.

Steve Shu

Don’t forget to subscribe to Steve Shu’s blog now (click icon)!

Update (3/29/05): I realize that I probably should not draw such a close parallel to the markets addressed in the hot hand fund post and Fred Wilson’s post. I suspect that Fred’s post has more focus on the venture capital markets as opposed to the overall market bubble burst we saw in Bubble 1.0. That said, the gist of my post was to provoke thought about when collective thought breaks down because of groupthink or other reasons.

Update on Post Regarding “Hot Hand Fund”

Reader Barbara has nicely pointed out to me that the "hot hand" fund that I referenced in my prior post doesn’t look like it’s performing that well right now (see Yahoo). I’ve reproduced the chart here (click to enlarge).

Mofqx

As a note for casual readers of my blog, my prior post was trying to draw connections between current, real-world applications and discussions in James Surowiecki’s book, "The Wisdom of Crowds". My posts should not be interpreted to be investment advice.

How performance of the "hot hand fund" (not the actual name of the fund) will shake out is to still to be determined I suppose. Cumulative returns definitely look above average compared to the market returns.

As an additional note, I understand that another academic in finance was wondering whether the effect could be the momentum effect or a variation of the momentum effect observed in behavioral finance. Note: I am not sure if this academic saw the returns chart and timescale covered. Timescale is a pertinent dimension for observing some of the behavioral finance effects.

Steve Shu

Don’t forget to subscribe to Steve Shu’s blog now (click icon)!