Interesting Entrepreneur & VC Dialogue

Jason Calacanis (connector, founder of Weblogs, Inc. and respected serial entrepreneur) recounts an interesting phone call with an associate at a VC firm. An associate (as opposed to an analyst) is typically an entry-level, partner-track position within a venture capital firm. To be truthful, the nature of Jason’s conversation is similar to ones I’ve seen and heard in the past, typically between Type A personality entrepreneurs and traditional VCs.

The typical conversation plays out as follows …

VC:

  • testing
  • trying to understand
  • testing

Entrepreneur:

  • ego
  • coy
  • ego

Although this backdrop of talking over one another is amusing, Jason sums up some great core values about running a business:

  1. Hustle
  2. Passion
  3. Resiliency

These are basically the characteristics of winners and entrepreneurs. To be fair though, the VC is just trying to understand the business model and slot the investment opportunity. If you applied the three things Jason mentioned to a coin-op laundry place, you would have a successful business too. It would be hard to find a VC or even a roll-up firm pursue that kind of deal though.

Update (4/7/05): Brad Feld also weighs in on Jason’s post. Looks like the conversation pattern is frequently the same the whole way along the food chain in the VC (seller)-VC (buyer) discussions.

Update (4/8/05): Paul Kedrosky at Infectious Greed has a post on the marketing value of Jason’s post.

A Note On Trackback Attacks

This site has been undergoing some trackback attacks today. IP numbers seem random, but post selection does not (?). Some issues connecting with TypePad server for admin, etc. Perhaps others are encountering the same issue. Depending how extensive this turns out, I may need to shut down the blog for awhile.

Management Consulting: The Spring Cleaning Method And Getting Over Humps

I had a lunch meeting the other day, and my contact and I talked briefly about one method that a number of management consulting firms use. I used this method now, and I used it at PRTM and prior companies. I suspect the method may be more typical in execution-oriented management consulting firms as compared to pure strategy firms. The technique never had a formal name, but I call it "The Spring Cleaning Method". It goes with the time of year, and it captures the spirit of the idea. Note that method should not be confused with the Al Dunlap ("Chainsaw Al") version of "cleaning house" though!

The Spring Cleaning Method of Management Consulting consists of an executive- or management-level meeting (e.g., 1.5 days) to talk about the business in great breadth, capture issues (no-holds barred), rank issues, strategize, and divide and attack.

The basic value of a Spring Cleaning management team meeting is as follows:

  • The meeting forces people to think proactively. While management may have regular weekly management meetings, it becomes easy to become caught up in the day-to-day grind and push off things that people don’t have time for but know are important.
  • The manager (e.g., CEO, COO, President, GM) that oversees the functional line roles has an opportunity to reset expectations and goals. This can be psychological or real. Whatever works to get people moving and thinking actively.
  • Involvement of a management consultant provides both an independent (non-political) fresh look and extra, versatile, project bandwidth. The management consultant may be expected to work with all of the above parties above to prepare information in advance, facilitate the meeting discussion using standard- or firm-specific business frameworks (or choke, create one on the fly), gather notes, organize and triage, and develop a proposed project plan and/or a traceable set of issues and action items. The management consultant is generally brought in to be a right-hand man to the sponsoring manager/executive.

In the Spring Cleaning meetings that I have worked on, a typical meeting may last 1.5 days. Roughly speaking, the first meeting is brainstorming and getting the info out. Through the night the consultant works to organize the notes, data, perform analyses, etc. The next half-day is spent working through the high points, prioritizing, and drilling down next steps.

While different clients vary, post-meeting the management consultant may be retained both as a generalist for project managing things forward and as specialist for working with a specific functional group (e.g., that has more items to work on, less bandwidth, more time critical items, more need for competitive or quantitative analysis). In change management, the goal of the organization is to get over humps or change course while running the business – not to employ a management consultant for the long-haul or create a dependency of the organization on the consultant.

As a final note, the project management aspect should not be underestimated (a form of overconfidence bias). As with many change management efforts, there is tremendous value to monitoring, measuring, and cracking the whip. Professional sports players (e.g., golf, tennis) don’t cut corners on coaches when making critical changes in technique. Why should a company be any different? If there is enough value to resolving issues, make sure that someone signs up a diplomatic and detailed-oriented person to make sure things drive forward.

Steve Shu

Don’t forget to subscribe to Steve Shu’s blog now (click icon)! Business and technology information for everyone.

Sapient CTO Says Blogs Are Digital Equivalent Of Pet Rock

Sapient, a business consulting and technology services company, speaks out on blogging. As posted by Jupiter Research:

It was bound to happen. Blogger backlash has set in. Witness
Sapient, a leading business consulting and technology services company,
issuing a “media alert” with the headline, “Blog tech doesn’t live up
to blog talk, according to Sapient CTO.” Ben Gaucherin, the CTO in
question, says blogs “are a fad fueled by pop culture’s desperate
search for the next big thing.” When I spoke with Gaucherin he was even
more emphatic than he was in his news alert. He told me that blogs are
the digital equivalent of the pet rock.
[InfoWorld: Columnists]

Although I have never thought of Sapient as being a traditional consulting firm (kind of a hybrid like Scient, iXL, Viant, Diamond Technology Partners, etc.), Sapient is one of the few branded consulting firms I have heard speak out on and against blogging. Will be interesting to see if other consulting firms speak out.

Hat tip: Scoble

For The Blog Museum: Email Signature Block Footer Of The Past Versus Present

Past footer for corporate emails:

The information contained in this transmission may contain privileged and confidential information.  It is intended only for the use of the person(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient,  you are hereby notified that any review, dissemination, distribution or duplication of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message. To reply to our email administrator directly, please send an email to postmaster@s4management.com

Present footer for corporate emails:

This email is [] bloggable [X] ask first [] private

Original source for present footer: I don’t know. Two steps removed is Ross Mayfield.