Series Of Posts On Entrepreneurial Mistakes When Raising Capital

Carlos Velez has put together a series of posts on the mistakes that entrepreneurs make when seeking capital. Here they are:

  1. Mistake #1 – Not writing a check
  2. Mistake #2 – VC is the only path
  3. Mistake #3 – Taking your time
  4. Mistake #4 – Learn how to swim before jumping into the pool
  5. Mistake #5 – Not seeking professional help

People should contact Carlos (per his post here) if they want to get a PDF of the article. Also if you resonate with #2 at all (which you should), you should also see the post at the Entrepreneurial Mind, "There Is Life Beyond Venture Capital".

Update (11/17/05): Carlos has a very nice follow-up post here that sheds more light on #5 with some specific examples in the drug discovery space.

Update (11/17/05): Texas Venture Capital Blog  has a post here where some  entrepreneurs come clean and admit to making some the exact mistakes that Carlos mentions.

What’s The Gotta Have Piece? Where’s The Fire To Create Movement? (Sales And Biz Dev)

In formulating new products and/or doing sales and business development, it is very easy to get caught up in jargon, frameworks, etc. that make a company’s offering sound sophisticated, but in the end, cloud the issue about why someone should purchase any product at all, not to mention your company’s product. Ed Sim, as motivated by a post by Mike Neven, posts about spinning one’s wheels in a sales process in the enterprise software space (I think the general direction of these implications go beyond just sales in enterprise software):

Interestingly enough, over the last year a trend I have been seeing is
the "do nothing" trend from enterprise customers.  We find out that the
potential customer has budget, we are selected as the winner, and then
they do nothing.

Thus, while a very large percentage of proposed projects meet all technical, functional, business, and investment criteria for a client, many projects do not move forward.

Mike Neven suggests mastering three soft factors in the sales process that drive the subjective decision-making process of purchasers:

  1. Fear of Being Left Behind
  2. Board Room Pressure
  3. The Squeaky Wheel

Annecdotally, I have not seen as many cases of #3 as the other areas as this requires sophisticated timing to know when and where the squeaky wheel in the organization is at. I have used #2 tactics in startup situations, but I have found this harder to do in larger companies as the distance between the product group and account gets wider. #1 is a good one, but sometimes the market structure and industry analyst coverage may not work to one’s favor. I would suggest an addition to Mike’s list – if one can (as a supplier) show up to the bid opportunity and demonstrate credibility that one can actually get the job done (as opposed to blowing smoke) or solve an even bigger problem for the client (a variation of chinning up), this can be a winning factor. I have used this tactic in a number of competitive deals (i.e., one or more competitors at the table) and led the winning bid. I might frame this tactic as a "Don’t Miss This One/Specific-Fit Opportunity".

Kn I Hv a Gnod

When my daugther started to learn how to write words (as opposed to just letters), some of the first things she scratched out were the letters, "Kn I hv a Gnod". I had no idea what it meant when I read it, but I later found out from my wife that my daughter was very intrinsically motivated to write it. It turns out that she wrote it during the holiday season, and the inscription was a question, "Can I have an egg nog?" (a popular holiday drink in the States). Totally remarkable I thought.

Figuring out what motivates someone is probably one of the most important things I have learned in business, but this knowledge is not something that is taught explicitly in any of the schooling I have ever been through. It was never explictly taught in any job I’ve been in before either.

Whether it be designing the sales compensation plan for a sales executive, coaching a subordinate that works for you, determining whether to hire someone, or developing a relationship with a sales prospect that does not know you very well, figuring out what makes other people tick is crucial (not to mention that it is important to reflect on what makes you tick too).

Jack Welch – Straight From The Gut … Plus The Soft Stuff Matters

Srinivasan Raghavan has a post that captures some of his perspectives on Jack Welch’s book as well as a Q&A that Welch did at my alma mater. Apparently during the Q&A, Welch said:

"Business schools need to teach more organizational dynamics and human resources …"

I agree with placing additional value there. As I’ve mentioned before, things like negotiations courses and organizational design are way too underrated by students at business schools. To butress my point annecdotally, this Columbia MBA alum also weighs things like negotiations classes very high. Maybe we have skewed opinions having both done business development work, but I could still make a case for rating this type of "soft stuff" as important.

Also as captured by Srinivasan on the topic of career advice,

[Welch] also recommended taking risks. “Be adventuresome,” Welch said.
“You’ve got lots of years to be cautious.” Resiliency is a critical
attribute, he continued. “You’re going to get knocked off the horse at
least five times in the course of a career. Know you’re going to make
mistakes, be humbled by it, learn from it, and get back on the horse.
But don’t be frightened by it, don’t live in fear.”

Very coincidental that I ran into this passage. A prospective MBA student just posed a question to me today on my other blog as to whether I wish I could do something over in my career. In the comments section, I responded by closing with something to the effect of, "I wish I had taken more risks when I was younger."

No More Dissing The Small Blog Companies – IBM Is In The Game

Slashdot points me to an InternetNews.com article and the fact that IBM has just introduced blog monitoring software today, called the Public Image Monitoring Solution:

IBM (Quote, Chart) today introduced new software that monitors and
analyzes blogs, wikis (define), news feeds,  consumer review sites,
newsgroups and other community-generated content to keep tabs on their
image.

Yes. You read it right. It reads "IBM". Blog stuff has moved into the enterprise software space it seems.

New Whitepaper On Corporate Group Blogs

Earlier this year, 21Publish released a whitepaper on corporate blog intranets (PDF file). The paper may have been a little before its time, but then I posted an update here, which indicated that I was starting to see trench-level activity in the corporate intranet space.

Today, 21Publish is releasing a new whitepaper (PDF file) that I authored on corporate group blogging. Stefan has more to say about the topic of corporate group blogging here.

Like my prior presentation on blogging for non-profits (Powerpoint format and PDF format), the new corporate group blogging whitepaper is intended to be an introduction to those wanting to learn more about group blogging. For this paper, I’ve set the discussion context around a customer loyalty framework, which has some different effects in a group blog versus an individual blog context.

Given the recent survey by PR Week and Burson-Marsteller, I hope that people find the 21Publish whitepaper and presentation resources timely. The PR Week article reports two good stats that managers should be aware of:

  • About 59 percent of CEOs surveyed said they find Web logs, or blogs,
    useful for internal communications, while 47 percent see them as tools
    for communication with external audiences …
  • About 18 percent … say they plan to host a company blog over the next two years.

Technorati Tags: , , ,

Update (11/8/05): Niall Cook and Fredrik Wacka provide some commentary here and here on the subject of group blogging (btw – thanks for the coverage of 21Publish). I suppose I should clarify that the summary of benefits I provided early in the paper (of group blogging over individual blogging) seem to be tripping people up a bit. My fault. Since I address some of the detailed items of concern later in the paper, the message at the earlier point in the paper should have been even higher-level: that group blogs benefit from both concentration of information and a larger scope of linkages to a company brand. That is, the underlying arguments for group over individual blogs are opportunities for better scope and scale  – a concept similar to that discussed in core business/economics strategy frameworks. Not evey one can have the stature of individual bloggers like Robert Scoble, Seth Godin, or Steve Rubel – group blogs are an alternative.

On My To Do List

Pandemic flu thing. Not sure what to do yet, but it is on my list. This thing is probably going to influence the equivalent of the home bomb shelter of the Cold War era.

Update (11/13/05): Scientific American article/cover story here.