Where Cockroaches Are Loved In The Tech Industry

Jason Caplain has some good notes from an NVCA meeting today. Good overview of the where the markets are at, where the shift in the tranche financings are going, and what has happened to some of the VC partnerships (relative to past speculations). What caught my eye was this (emphasis is mine):

There is a very healthy IPO and acquisition market with good companies that have gone through bad times.

Paul Brown and I used to use a term for this. Not a very good marketing term, but for early-stage companies that survived for more than 18 months after the nuclear holocaust, cliff dropoff in customer prospect propensity to buy, and bubble 1.0 fallout … well we referred to such companies as the "cockroaches" of the industry to reflect their resiliency to survive. Looks like cockroaches are coming into favor. All together now, "We are the cockroaches."

Past Study On Search Funds

Andy posts and points me to some Stanford business school information on Search Funds. A free, Stanford business school note/search fund study is here (before clicking: note PDF link). The Stanford site indicates:

Conceived in 1984, the search fund is an investment vehicle in which investors financially support an entrepreneur’s efforts to locate and acquire a privately held company. Recent MBA and law school graduates are using this approach more and more frequently to become entrepreneurs shortly after graduation, despite their lack of operating experience.

It’s something I thought about doing (for a passing moment) when I originally moved to Dallas – for some reason I’ve never heard the name of this type of thing. Perhaps it is because it’s kind of a hybrid between middle-market investment banking, LBO, and angel funding deals. I never learned about this type of fund at the University of Chicago’s course on Entrepreneurship, Private Equity, and Venture Capital. Additionally, I’ve not run into any friends that have used the term. Kind of funny. I suppose another explanation for me failing to catch the term "search fund" is that I tend to like straight-up equity deals better – then I can forget about all of the "complex" finance stuff associated with debt deals like unlevering the beta, using the adjusted present value(APV) method, etc. 🙂

Interesting Entrepreneur & VC Dialogue

Jason Calacanis (connector, founder of Weblogs, Inc. and respected serial entrepreneur) recounts an interesting phone call with an associate at a VC firm. An associate (as opposed to an analyst) is typically an entry-level, partner-track position within a venture capital firm. To be truthful, the nature of Jason’s conversation is similar to ones I’ve seen and heard in the past, typically between Type A personality entrepreneurs and traditional VCs.

The typical conversation plays out as follows …

VC:

  • testing
  • trying to understand
  • testing

Entrepreneur:

  • ego
  • coy
  • ego

Although this backdrop of talking over one another is amusing, Jason sums up some great core values about running a business:

  1. Hustle
  2. Passion
  3. Resiliency

These are basically the characteristics of winners and entrepreneurs. To be fair though, the VC is just trying to understand the business model and slot the investment opportunity. If you applied the three things Jason mentioned to a coin-op laundry place, you would have a successful business too. It would be hard to find a VC or even a roll-up firm pursue that kind of deal though.

Update (4/7/05): Brad Feld also weighs in on Jason’s post. Looks like the conversation pattern is frequently the same the whole way along the food chain in the VC (seller)-VC (buyer) discussions.

Update (4/8/05): Paul Kedrosky at Infectious Greed has a post on the marketing value of Jason’s post.

A Note On Trackback Attacks

This site has been undergoing some trackback attacks today. IP numbers seem random, but post selection does not (?). Some issues connecting with TypePad server for admin, etc. Perhaps others are encountering the same issue. Depending how extensive this turns out, I may need to shut down the blog for awhile.

Management Consulting: The Spring Cleaning Method And Getting Over Humps

I had a lunch meeting the other day, and my contact and I talked briefly about one method that a number of management consulting firms use. I used this method now, and I used it at PRTM and prior companies. I suspect the method may be more typical in execution-oriented management consulting firms as compared to pure strategy firms. The technique never had a formal name, but I call it "The Spring Cleaning Method". It goes with the time of year, and it captures the spirit of the idea. Note that method should not be confused with the Al Dunlap ("Chainsaw Al") version of "cleaning house" though!

The Spring Cleaning Method of Management Consulting consists of an executive- or management-level meeting (e.g., 1.5 days) to talk about the business in great breadth, capture issues (no-holds barred), rank issues, strategize, and divide and attack.

The basic value of a Spring Cleaning management team meeting is as follows:

  • The meeting forces people to think proactively. While management may have regular weekly management meetings, it becomes easy to become caught up in the day-to-day grind and push off things that people don’t have time for but know are important.
  • The manager (e.g., CEO, COO, President, GM) that oversees the functional line roles has an opportunity to reset expectations and goals. This can be psychological or real. Whatever works to get people moving and thinking actively.
  • Involvement of a management consultant provides both an independent (non-political) fresh look and extra, versatile, project bandwidth. The management consultant may be expected to work with all of the above parties above to prepare information in advance, facilitate the meeting discussion using standard- or firm-specific business frameworks (or choke, create one on the fly), gather notes, organize and triage, and develop a proposed project plan and/or a traceable set of issues and action items. The management consultant is generally brought in to be a right-hand man to the sponsoring manager/executive.

In the Spring Cleaning meetings that I have worked on, a typical meeting may last 1.5 days. Roughly speaking, the first meeting is brainstorming and getting the info out. Through the night the consultant works to organize the notes, data, perform analyses, etc. The next half-day is spent working through the high points, prioritizing, and drilling down next steps.

While different clients vary, post-meeting the management consultant may be retained both as a generalist for project managing things forward and as specialist for working with a specific functional group (e.g., that has more items to work on, less bandwidth, more time critical items, more need for competitive or quantitative analysis). In change management, the goal of the organization is to get over humps or change course while running the business – not to employ a management consultant for the long-haul or create a dependency of the organization on the consultant.

As a final note, the project management aspect should not be underestimated (a form of overconfidence bias). As with many change management efforts, there is tremendous value to monitoring, measuring, and cracking the whip. Professional sports players (e.g., golf, tennis) don’t cut corners on coaches when making critical changes in technique. Why should a company be any different? If there is enough value to resolving issues, make sure that someone signs up a diplomatic and detailed-oriented person to make sure things drive forward.

Steve Shu

Don’t forget to subscribe to Steve Shu’s blog now (click icon)! Business and technology information for everyone.